LEFT
2026.W31ISSB · IFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures · Jun 2023 · para ○○
ESG SECOND BRAIN · B2B SAAS
One ESG lead.
Two brains.
We keep the world's ESG standards current every week. Your company's own material stays inside your company. Where the two meet is an answer that fits only you.
12 years in ESG assessment & risk monitoring · ESG Data Inc.
No card required · ESG disclosure free after account review
ESG Disclosure · ISSB S2
Export xlsxEvidence mix — Left Brain 4 · Right Brain 2
Under ISSB S2, Scope 3 must be assessed against paragraph ○○ LEFTDIS. Your 2025 figures cover tier-1 suppliers only RIGHT.
RIGHT
2025_supplier_emissions.xlsx
CONCEPT ① · LLM WIKI
Knowledge compiles into pages
Source documents are read into linked topic pages. Nothing is re-derived per question.
What the person in charge actually deals with
ESG is hard not because the material is missing, but because you re-derive it from scratch every time.
No dedicated staff
Strategy or admin teams carry ESG on the side.
The standards keep moving
Keeping up with ISSB, ESRS, VSME and KSSB is a full job by itself.
General AI does not know your company
Plausible answers with nothing behind them.
The material is scattered
When the owner changes, last year’s work disappears with them.
CONCEPT ① · LLM WIKI
Stop re-deriving. Compile once, then keep it current.
LLM Wiki is a pattern, not a product — a markdown knowledge wiki that an AI writes and maintains. Instead of digging through source documents on every question, you read a page that is already synthesised. The SARBIS Left Brain is that pattern applied to ESG disclosure.
The usual way · RAG · file upload
Re-discovered on every question
Documents are chopped into fragments; each question pulls similar fragments and synthesises them on the spot. The synthesis is thrown away.
- Limitation: The same question costs the same time and money again
- Limitation: Only fragments surface, so relationships between documents vanish
- Limitation: Nothing accumulates — the synthesis is discarded
LEFTLLM WIKI
Compiled once, kept current
Source documents are read into topic pages, pages are linked to each other, and new material revises the existing pages. What remains is a document a person can read and correct.
- Benefit: A question only has to read a page that already exists
- Benefit: Pages link to each other, so relationships are visible
- Benefit: Every addition makes the wiki denser — it compounds
“RAG re-derives knowledge from scratch on every question. An LLM Wiki compiles it once and keeps it up to date.”
① INGEST
Read and organise
New source documents are read into topic pages — either a new page or a revision of an existing one.
② QUERY
Read the wiki first
A question reads the synthesised pages rather than the whole corpus, and answers with citations.
③ LINT
Tend the garden
Duplicates, contradictions, orphans, stale pages and missing links are swept up on a schedule. That is why it does not rot.
CONCEPT ② · HERMES AGENT
Nobody has to trigger it. It lives on the server and runs itself.
The wiki had one weakness left: someone had to call the AI and ask it to tidy up. A Hermes Agent is not a browser tab — it is a process running on a server. It ingests, organises and lints on a schedule, and turns what it learns into skills and memory so the next run is better.
“The Agent That Grows With You — an autonomous agent that lives on your server and gets more capable the longer it runs.”
[EN TBD: agent name]
Skills — teach it once
Repeated work is stored as a procedure. You do not explain it a second time.
Memory — context carries over
Company profile, chosen standards and past judgements are remembered.
Self-improvement — it reviews its own work
After each run it asks what there was to learn, and folds the answer into the next one.
CONCEPT ③ · TWO BRAINS
The value sits exactly where the standards meet your own material.
LEFT · read-only
The world's ESG knowledge
Ten domains — disclosure standards, regulation, climate, ratings, cases. Curated as an LLM Wiki, reviewed by specialists, shipped weekly. Every customer sees the same edition.
- DIS
- REG
- CLI
- ENV
- SOC
- GOV
- FIN
- RAT
- CAS
- INC
[EN TBD: domain names]
Bridges
What the standard asks for ↔ what you already have
RIGHT · fully isolated
Your company's knowledge
Emissions data, policies, minutes, past reports, supplier files. Stored per company in an isolated space; the more it holds, the more the answers fit you.
- Emissions data
- ESG policies
- Past reports
- Board material
- Supplier files
- Minutes
The Right Brain is isolated per company
Customer data is stored in a separate space and never shared across customers.
The Left Brain is read-only
Customer data does not flow into it, and is never used to train or ship it.
You can take your data out at any time
Full export of originals and entries is always available, regardless of subscription state.
USE CASES
Work like this becomes possible
These are the things people actually do with it most often — not a closed feature list, but examples of what follows once the standards and your own material can be read together.
01 · DISCLOSURE
ESG disclosure
See what is still open per standard, fill it in through conversation, export to xlsx.
- 45 framework-independent metrics with per-standard mapping
- Each metric shows the requirement and your evidence side by side
- Values are proposed, never auto-confirmed
ESG disclosure — Learn more → (coming soon)
02 · DIAGNOSIS
ESG management diagnosis
Compare the level the standards ask for against where you are, and rank what is missing.
- Maturity by area against the required level
- Gaps sorted by impact × effort
- Evidence is fetched before you answer each item
ESG management diagnosis — Learn more → (coming soon)
03 · DOCUMENT
Documents from your own data
Feed in your data; we answer under the standards you chose and turn it into the document you actually need.
- Sustainability report · buyer request form · internal approval memo · due-diligence response
- Sections generated from the standard, drafts written with citations attached
- DOCX · PDF · xlsx · HWPX — citations carried as footnotes
Documents from your own data — Learn more → (coming soon)
04 · EVIDENCE
Grounded ESG answers
Any ESG question — including law and regulation — answered with its source. If there is no evidence, it says so.
- Disclosure standards, regulation, statutes, guidance, rating methodologies
- Cited down to institution, document, date and paragraph
- Standards evidence and your own evidence shown separately
Grounded ESG answers — Learn more → (coming soon)
05 · SCORECARD
Build your own ESG assessment tool
We design an assessment tool against the criteria you want — items, scoring and thresholds included.
- Items composed from your standards, sector and purpose
- Adjust weights, points and grade bands yourself
- Ships as questionnaire, scoring sheet and verdict report
Build your own ESG assessment tool — Learn more → (coming soon)
06 · SUPPLY CHAIN
Supplier assessment
The criteria and the tool you send to suppliers — what your buyer asks of you, reshaped for the tier below.
- Question sets split by supplier size and sector
- Returned answers scored automatically, gaps and outliers flagged
- Results feed your Scope 3 calculation and due-diligence answers
Supplier assessment — Learn more → (coming soon)
07 · REQUEST FORM
Fill in a customer’s request form
Drop in the ESG information request file a customer sent you: we read what each item means, pull the values from your own material, and return the same form as a filled workbook.
- Reads item names, units and periods to work out what is being asked
- Finds the value and its source file in your Right Brain and fills the cell
- Cells it cannot ground are left empty and flagged — never invented
Fill in a customer’s request form — Learn more → (coming soon)
08 · AND MORE
Whatever is not listed here
If it concerns ESG and can be grounded in evidence, it is usually possible. Describe the job you have in mind and we will tell you whether it works and what material it needs.
TRUST · EVIDENCE AND CITATIONS
Every answer carries its sources. With no grounds, it says so.
Evidence mix — Left Brain 4 · Right Brain 2
LEFT
2026.W31ISSB · IFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures · Jun 2023 · para ○○
“…an entity shall disclose its Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions in accordance with paragraph ○○, together with the measurement approach, inputs and assumptions used.”
RIGHT
2025_supplier_emissions.xlsx
2 bridges — VSME waste metric ↔ supplier emissions workbook
Left-brain and right-brain evidence are always shown as separate groups. If no citation is found, no answer is produced — you get what was found and what was not.
[EN TBD: three-principles heading]
Every answer carries its sources
An item without institution, document name and date is never shipped in the first place.
With no grounds, it says it does not know
Zero citations means no answer. This cannot be switched off in settings.
Left and right evidence stay distinguishable
Encoded by colour, shape and label — so it survives black-and-white printing.
GETTING STARTED
From sign-up to first answer in one business day
STEP 1
Sign up free
Work email and name. No card required.
STEP 2
Account review
We verify the business and open your isolated workspace. Within 1 business day (proposed).
STEP 3
Conversational onboarding
Five steps for your standards and starting material — not twenty form fields.
STEP 4
First answer
The Left Brain alone can already answer. One uploaded file creates your first bridge.
No card. ESG disclosure free after review.
Accounts are reviewed · within 1 business day (proposed)
Pricing — [EN TBD: plan names]